1/18/2024 0 Comments Coherence theory theoryBradley, Essays on Truth and Reality (Oxford, 1914), p. IX, which will be cited as Joachim and Bosanquet respectively. Joachim, The Nature of Truth, (Oxford 1906), and Bernard Bosanquetâs Logic (2nd ed. And just as each part of the field has its own colour, whatever may be the cause of its having that colour, so each judgment has its own meaning and according to that meaning is true or false. The dependence of the meaning of a judgment on its context may be compared to the way in which the colour of one part of the visual field may be affected through contrast by the colour of a neighboring part. The following analogy may perhaps be helpful, though it should not be pressed too far. âHe has fewer than 50 hairsâ is less determinate than âHe has exactly 37 hairs,â but not vague in the way that âHe is baldâ is. Vagueness must not be confused with indeterminateness. âJudgmentâ is the word used by these authors, where we have been using âbeliefâ and its âmeaningâ is what we have called âpropositional referenceâ. Bradley, Essays on Truth and Reality (Oxford, 1914). Joachimâs The Nature of Truth, (Oxford 1906), and Bernard Bosanquetâs Logic (2nd ed. Broad âMr Bradley on Truth and Reality,â Mind, vol. process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. Since, unlike the Correspondence Theory and Pragmatism, the Coherence Theory is almost entirely concerned with Question I and hardly at all with Question II, I propose to say all I have to say about it in the present chapter. Without going into any great detail it will, I think, be possible to show that the Coherence Theory is largely based on a serious confusion the unfortunate consequences of which extend far beyond the present context. According to Mr Russell the fallacy in all these arguments lies in their assuming the axiom of internal relations, but it seems to me that part of what his opponents say does not depend for its plausibility on this axiom and may be worth a fresh investigation. The absurdities which result from this view have been most amusingly set out by Mr Russell in his essay âOn the Monistic Theory of Truthâ in Philosophical Essays, 1 but although this reductio ad absurdum is a conclusive refutation of the theory, it is still, I think, instructive to consider some of the arguments used by its adherents both in defending their own and in attacking rival positions. The third well-known theory of truth is the coherence theory which is absolutely irreconcileable with ours, since it holds that the truth of a belief that A is B depends not on whether A is B, but on how far the belief that it is forms part of a coherent system.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |